AI Tools for Research & Writing Success

Explore librarian recommended AI tools to boost your academic research, writing, and source evaluation skills.

 

KEY REMINDERS for Ethical Generative AI Use (librarian tip sheet)

 

1. AI is a Brainstorming Tool, Not a Writing Substitute

Use AI to spark ideas, explore topics, or clarify confusing concepts—but write in your own voice.
🔍 Professors value original thinking. Use AI to support—not replace—it.


 

2. Always Fact-Check and Verify Sources

AI can provide inaccurate information or fake citations. Always check sources using library databases or trusted websites.
📚 Good research comes from good sources.


 

3. Be Transparent About How You Used AI

If AI is allowed, be honest about how you used it—brainstorming, outlining, grammar checks, etc.
💬 When in doubt, include a short note or ask your professor.


 

4. Don’t Use AI to Write Final Drafts

AI often lacks nuance, analysis, and depth. Overuse can weaken your work and cross ethical lines.
✏️ Writing is thinking. Don’t skip the learning process.


 

5. Know Your Instructor’s Expectations

Some professors allow limited AI use, others don’t at all. Check the syllabus or ask directly.

 

Perplexity to explore Topics, potential research questions and keywords 

 

Tool: Perplexity.ai (https://www.perplexity.ai)

 

Use it for: Initial topic exploration with quick, easy summaries to get started.

 

What It Does
Searches and summarizes content with citations. Offers related questions.

 

How to Use It: Prompt examples for WRT188 and WRT288

 

Exploring research topics: 

  • “Suggest some engaging research topics related to [course subject] for a college writing course." 
  • "Can you help me brainstorm ideas for a research paper about [specific theme]?" 

Crafting a research question 

  • "How can I turn my general interest in [topic] into a focused research question?" 
  • "What are some examples of effective research questions for a paper on [subject]?" 

Identifying keywords 

  • "Provide me with key terms and phrases to use when searching for sources on [research question]." 
  • "How can I refine my keyword search to find more relevant resources about [topic]?" 

Finding supporting evidence 

  • "What types of sources should I look for to back up my points on [main idea]?" 
  • "Where can I find statistical data or examples to support my arguments about [thesis]?" 

Librarian Tip: Use Perplexity to prep for research appointments.

 

Consensus to test a research question. (Pro version free for students for 2025/26 academic year)

 

Tool: Consensus (https://consensus.app)

 

Use it for: Quickly testing and verifying research questions by finding consensus from scientific research, summarizing evidence from peer-reviewed studies to support or challenge claims.

 

Best Fit For: Students and facutly engaged in evidence-based research, literature reviews, or seeking quick evidence validation in fields such as social sciences, education, health, and psychology.

 

How to Use It

  • Prompt Example (Upper-Level Undergrad – WRT288):

         “Is there scientific consensus on the effects of social media use on adolescent mental health?”

  • Prompt Example (Graduate – Public Health or Education):

         “What does current research say about the impact of food deserts on community health outcomes?”

 

Elicit for Advanced Topic Exploration.

 

Tool: Elicit (https://elicit.org)

 

Use it for: Start with a broad research question for advanced topic exploration that will generate relevant academic literature for deeper research.

 

Best Fit For:  Upper-level undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty doing evidence-based research or literature reviews in fields like social sciences, education, health, and psychology.

 

How to Use It

  • Prompt Example (Upper-Level Undergrad – WRT288):

     

    "What are evidence-based research questions about social media and teen mental health?"

     

  • Prompt Example (Graduate – Public Health or Education):

"What are some logical and adaptive research questions about food deserts and their impact on community health?"

 

 

 

Semantic Scholar to find and review Scholarly Sources.

 

Tool: Semantic Scholar (https://www.semanticscholar.org)

 

Use it for: Finding, Reviewing and summarizing scholarly articles. After identifying a clear question or source, from one of the tools above you are ready for Semantic Scholar. Search for specific topics, papers, or authors.

 

Best Fit For: Upper-level undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty finding, analyzing, and tracing scholarly sources in fields like social sciences, education, health, and STEM.

 

What It Does
Provides AI-generated summaries and citation graphs for academic papers.

 

 

Librarian Tip: Use summaries to help compare arguments and structure literature reviews.

 

Chatgpt for Source Evaluation.

 

Tool: ChatGPT

 

Use it for: Source analysis, generating ideas, drafting research questions, explaining concepts, and summarizing information.


What It Does
ChatGPT can simulate CRAAP or SIFT analysis for a source when prompted. The CRAAP and SIFT tests evaluate sources by addressing the following: 

 

CRAAP Test- helpful when evaluating more traditional sources

  • C - Currency
  • R - Relevance
  • A - Authority
  • A - Accuracy
  • P - Purpose

SIFT Method - Used to evaluate online, popular, or rapidly disseminated information

  • S - Stop
  • I - Investigate the Source
  • F - Find Better Coverage
  • T - Trace Claims, Quotes, and Media to the Original Context

How to Use It

  • Prompt example (WRT100): "Use the CRAAP test to evaluate this article from a blog: [URL]."

  • Prompt example (WRT188): "Apply the SIFT method to this news article on climate change: [URL]. What are its sources?"

Librarian Tip: Always cross-check AI's findings with database search results or a librarian.

 

When and How to Cite

1. Do I Need to Cite AI?

 

You must cite AI if:

- You quote its exact words.

- You paraphrase its ideas or unique examples.

- You use its structure, outline, or generated content directly in your work.

You do not need to cite AI if:

- You only used it for private brainstorming or idea generation.

- Nothing from the AI appears in your final work.

- You used it like a conversation that inspired you but left no direct trace.

 

2. APA Style (7th ed.)

 

Reference list entry:

OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (Aug 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/

 

In-text citations:

- Paraphrase: (OpenAI, 2025)

- Quotation: OpenAI (2025) stated, “...”

 

Optional transparency note (if brainstorming only):

Early brainstorming ideas were generated using ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2025) and later revised by the author.

 

3. MLA Style (9th ed.)

 

Works Cited entry:

OpenAI. ChatGPT, Aug. 14 2025 version, https://chat.openai.com/.

 

In-text citations:

- Paraphrase: (OpenAI)

- Quotation: OpenAI writes, “...”

Optional transparency note (if brainstorming only):

Initial ideas were developed in conversation with ChatGPT (OpenAI).

 

4. Quick Decision Flow

 

1. Did AI content appear in your paper? → Cite it.

2. Did it just inspire you without showing up in your paper? → No citation required (optional acknowledgment).

3. Professor requires disclosure? → Follow their policy.

 

References:

 

American Psychological Association. (2023, August). How to cite ChatGPT. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt

Modern Language Association. (2023, May). How do I cite generative AI in MLA style? https://style.mla.org/citing-generative-ai/



Adapted from American Psychological Association, How to cite ChatGPT (2023) and Modern Language Association, How do I cite generative AI in MLA style? (2023).